Tuesday, 31 March 2009

My trip on the Jeannie Johnston trip to Dublin - day one

I arrived at the ship at about 18.00, after a long bus journey from my home. On my back was an 80-litre rucksack, into which I had packed many changes of clothes. I was one of the first volunteers to arrive, and the bosun's mate, a young Australian woman, took me down to choose a berth. Each berth had two bunks in it, each with a blanket, pillow case and life preserver. On the wall hung waterproofs and harnesses. As the ship was not going to be full I decided to have a berth on my own, and she pointed out one where there was a little leak from the deck above - the top bunk was unusable, but the bottom was fine and dry. I chose this, although later regretted it. It never leaked; indeed, it remained quite dry unlike other bunks, but the berth was filled with a sickly damp smell for the entire journey.

After getting a few things ready I went up onto deck. People were milling around and dinner was being served by the galley. People were eating with their plates resting on the side rail of the ship. I had eaten a large lunch with Sencan and some of her colleagues (it was International Talk Like A Pirate Day, and they were all taking advantage of that. It seemed very apt). I was told that were were going to have to move the ship, so as the sun continued to sink down on the other side of the river we pulled in the mooring lines and motored upstream slightly. I had little idea of what was happening, but helped where and when instructed. A heaving line was thrown out, at the end of which was a Monkey's fist, a knot designed to make the end of the rope heavier. This line was thrown out, and someone on land pulled it, also pulling across the heavier mooring line. When that was attached to a bollard, we on deck had to tighten the lines then wrap them around large wooden posts called Samson Posts.

After we settled in I watched the Waverley come in - the last sea-going paddle steamer in the world that is based up near Glasgow. I had seen this in Scotland, but had no idea that it ever came down to the south coast. Then everyone got ready to go out. Our new berth was in the actual docks area, so we had a long walk to get out and into town. The security guards noted our leaving, and we soon settled in a pub which is adjacent to the cinema that Şencan and I go to. It felt strange being there in such different company. I had four pints, but after the Irish lads went on to a club in town, myself, a couple of the Irish and virtually the entire English contingent went back to the ship. I found that a visit to the undoubted attractions of a strip club did not tempt me when compared to a lie-down in bed.

Monday, 30 March 2009

Book reviews: "Triptych", by Karin Slaughter

I've not read any of Karin Slaughter's books before, and Şencan warned me that it would be a bloodbath. So it turned out to be.

The book starts off at a frightening pace. A prostitute is found murdered on the stairwell of a run-down block of flats in Atlanta. Jaded Detective Michael Ormewood is called in to investigate, and he is soon joined by Special Agent Will Trent. From the start, the two policemen do not get on. It is exceptionally fast-paced, indeed, it is a little too much so, and I had to start reading it twice after I lost track. Additionally, the initial part of the story is written from Ormewood's perspective, and at this point he is a thoroughly dislikeable character.

The story improves when John Shelley is introduced as a sub-plot. John is in his mid-thirties, and just out of jail after having spent twenty years inside for the rape and murder of a schoolgirl. Soon he discovers that someone is using his name and social security number, and has a perfect credit rating. John is a very well-drawn character; the crime he was convicted for is truly heinous, but so are his tales from prison. As his story unfolds, it becomes clear that he may not have been guilty of the crime he was convicted of. This part of the story is told very well, and the ambiguity of his guilt is beguiling. The cleverness of the writing means that he is an utterly sympathetic character, even if you believe he is guilty.

After this point, the story takes off and becomes a riveting read. It is sparsely written, and the action carries you on. It jumps through time from the present to the past, ye this never gets confusing; it is always obvious which time you are in.

The major problem with the book is its use of stereotypes. There are two disparate detectives who do not get along or trust each other, and a murderer who strikes rather to close to home. It gets worse when you examine Ormewood's character - he runs the full gamut of family problems (a disabled child, a wife who is falling out of love with him, and a neighbour it appears that he is having an affair with).

All of the major characters are broken. Whilst all literary characters should be flawed in some way, the flaws in these characters go so much deeper than just a drink problem or a failed relationship. Unfortunately, rather than giving the characters depth, it makes them feel a little like caricatures. Only John feels like a real human being.

The entire feel of the book is dark and foreboding. Some of the descriptions of the victims' injuries are fairly gruesome, and perhaps unnecessarily so. The story could have been equally well told without it. Frankly, it did not shock or horrify me; I just found it bland and distasteful.

This was an entertaining book to read, despite its dark atmosphere. I would give it three out of five. This would have been four out of five if it were not for the first couple of chapters, which were far poorer than the rest of the book. If there was a sequel to this stand-alone novel, I would read it.

My trip on the Jeannie Johnston trip to Dublin - background

Background
The following is the text from a trip that I did on the sailing ship 'Jeannie Johnston' to Dublin last year. The full report can be found on my main website.

On Thursday, September 18th I went to the Southampton Boat Show, nominally to perform some research into a short story that I was planning to write. Whilst there, I went around the Jeanie Johnston, a replica 19th Century tall ship.

I got chatting to Rob, an Irish man who works on board the ship. During our conversation he told me that they were sailing to Dublin on Saturday, and that there were places still available for trainees. I complained that I did not have any experience, and he said that was fine. It was certainly a tempting offer, and after walking around the show some more I went to the Platform pub and had a pint. My usual hobby I long-distance walking, and the thought of going on board a sailing ship for a short period was certainly intriguing.

Before I could go, I had to get permission. I gave my partner, Şencan, a quick phone call, but she was not at her desk and so I left a message for her. When she phoned back I asked her if she wanted to come. She could not take the time of work, but was keen for me to go. Having got the right answer, I went back to the ship and booked myself in for the trip. Rob and the captain gave me a list of things that I would need - passport (obviously), sunglasses, sun-tan lotion, lots of spare, warm clothes and a good coat. It seemed like a short list for what promised to be a four or five day trip.

Sunday, 29 March 2009

The agony and the ecstasy of Formula 1

So the start of the Formula 1 season is upon us.

Another year of pain, heartache, and bewilderment.
Another year of scandals, incomprehensible rule changes and stupid mistakes.
Another year of hoping, wishing, and crossed fingers.
Another year of joy, excitement and, most of all, action!

Every year I tell myself that I will not watch another race, that I've had enough of the stupid, childish politics and arguments that goes hand-in-hand with what should be the pinnacle of motorsport. Yet every year I get up early to watch the first race of the season.

Why do I do it? Why do I put myself through so much? It's not as if I'm a fast driver (we have a Honda Jazz, for goodness' sake), and no-one would ever accuse me of being a petrol head. I don't do any competitive sport - I prefer to challenge my own body and mind, not take part in some macho competition.

Despite all this, I love watching twenty overpaid drivers go round and round a twisting circuit for 90 minutes, 18 or so times a year. The reason is simple. At the final race of last year, in Brazil, I went through so many different emotions on the same lap - horror, excitement, anguish, pain; then, finally, joy. Lewis Hamilton needed fifth place to win the F1 world championship over Ferrari's Felipe Massa. Going into the last lap, he was sixth in truly awful weather. However, Glock was on dry tyres on a wet track. Hamilton overtook him on the penultimate corner, sealing the world championship.

So many races, so many miles of racing, and the championship came down to the penultimate lap. It was exhilarating to watch, yet my joy for Lewis Hamilton was tempered by my sympathy for Felipe Massa, the man who would be king. The expression on the face of Massa's father in the pits sums up formula 1 perfectly - joy as Massa passed the line, winning the race, then horror as Hamilton made his move to win the championship. Only the hardest of hearts could have felt anything but sympathy for the Massas and Ferarri.

Yet the year was dominated by stupid mistakes by all the major drivers. These are to be expected, especially as so many of the top drivers were young and relatively inexperienced. The real shame was that the championship was riven by political infighting and particularly incomprehensible decisions by both the FIA and the race marshals, who have an inordinate amount of power over each race. The championship was decided in closed rooms, not on the track.

That is bad for everyone.

Yet the racing is just part of it. The technology is also utterly fascinating. This year is a case in point - the rules have undergone massive changes, and this has led to a reversal of the field for today's race - the two best teams of last year, McLaren and Ferrari,are at the back and in the middle of the field respectively, whilst last year's back marker team, the re-badged Honda, is at the front. Why have Brawn managed to get such a good car, and McLaren failed (they share the same engine)? The answer is simple; great people, great minds and the application of great technology.

Every one of the drivers is superb. Yes, all of them. Even Sato. Go onto any Formula 1 website or forum and you'll get criticisms of drivers (some justified, much of it not). Yet all of them, even the perennial back-markers, are all far better drivers than I will ever be. They are fit men (you have to be to be able to cope with up to 5 time the force of gravity on your head and neck), and all are undoubtedly intelligent. You need a superlicence from the FIA just to compete, and those are not granted without good reason.

More than anything else, Formula 1 is a thinking man's game. Again, this is part of its appeal.

It is surprising - and perhaps alarming - how much my heart rate increases during dramatic moment in a race. My heart feels as though it is busting out of my ribcage, working far harder than it does on a walk. How can such a static activity as watching the TV cause such ructions within my body? The answer is simple. I'm in love.

Yes, I'm in love with Formula 1. And that, my friends, is the agony and the ecstasy of the sport.

Saturday, 28 March 2009

A complete history of my left ankle

I looked down at my left ankle as I was sitting in the bath today; my much-abused, scarred and skinny left ankle. It is my Achilles Heel, figuratively, if not literally. All the miles that I have walked and the mountains I have climbed make my past feel like it is a different reality, as though it belonged to a different person.

For thirteen long years, an injury to my left ankle dominated my life. Just when I thought that it was finally healed, that the pain was gone forever, I would be launched back down into the abyss. This is the story of my life through that time. It is all from memory, without any external references to go by. Some of the timings, particularly of the earlier days, could be wrong, but are indicative of what happened. I may be guilty of unreliable narration, but no errors will be deliberate.

I first noticed the problem at school; at least, I think I did. The memories are so hazy, clouded not just by time, but also by pain. The primary school was right next door to my parent's house, the house in which they still live, in a quiet, nondescript village in southern Derbyshire. Off to one side of the playground there was a sand pit; it may have been there for the juniors to play in, but it was also used as a long-jump pit. I used to like jumping, which is odd, as I have never really learnt how to fall.

One day I jumped into the pit, and was rewarded with a sharp pain from my left ankle. It was a searing hot pain that just as soon subsided, to be replaced by a dull ache. I looked down, pulled my sock back, and was greeted with the sight of something strange above the knuckle of my left ankle. I touched it gently, pushed against it, and was rewarded with another sharp pain as something popped back into place. As far as I remember I didn't tell anyone, and just hobbled around for the rest of the day.

Fast-forward some time, perhaps days, probably months. I am sitting at the bottom of the stairs in our house, the house that my dad had built for us, holding my ankle out and flexing it, wanting someone to see the problem. It started to happen increasingly frequently; I would be walking along, then I would have a sharp bout of pain and the peroneal tendon would ride up over the knuckle. In response, I would just push it back over. With hindsight, I was probably doing lots of damage.

I think I was about eleven or twelve when this happened. I moved on to middle school, where my leg was put in a cast for two or three months. The idea was to immobilise the ankle in order to allow it to settle. It seemed like a vain hope at the time, and so it turned out. The cast was lightweight, made from fibreglass, and over the months my left leg whittled away to nothing, the muscle lost through disuse. At first I had to put a ruler down it to scratch any itches; later on, a pen could be squeezed down the gap. After a few months they replaced the cast with another fibreglass one. They cut off the old cast with a vicious-looking circular saw, and I was greeted with the sight of horrid layers of flaking dead skin on my leg. Then it was encased once more; out of sight, but certainly not out of mind.

I had these large, wooden crutches, the sort you see in films of injured soldiers during the Great War. The modern, metal ones were available, but for some reason I was given the unwieldy wooden ones. The strange thing is I actually quite liked them, and in future times I would ask for them specifically. I became very adept at moving speedily with them, the top of the crutches seemingly embedded under my arms. I was a speed demon on crutches.

Other things proved more difficult. I used to have baths to clean myself; dad would wrap a bin liner around the cast, and I would sit in the bath with my leg sticking out. I recall it as being an impossibly awkward position, and utterly humiliating.

Then, when I was thirteen, I moved onto Denstone College. This school, situated on the top of a remote Staffordshire hillside, took pride in excelling in anything outdoors; sports, CCF and Pioneers, all physical activity, and all things that I had terrible trouble in doing. This set the tone for the five years that I spent there. It was a good school, but the emphasis on sports rather than academic excellence did not suit me.

At one point my dad and I were asked to go into hospital. We were greeted by a doctor and a photographer. I took my shoes and socks off and lay down on the bed. What followed was hideous. I gritted my teeth against the pain as the doctor manipulated my ankle into various positions; he would hold it in each one as the photographer snapped away. Apparently the photos were taken for a medical journal; if so, I never saw the results.

The doctors gave me a list of things that I could not do; I could not roller-skate, ice-skate, run, ski, or do anything where I stood a chance of twisting my ankle and worsening the problem. The list seemed all too restrictive for a thirteen-year old boy. My elder sister used to go roller-skating at a rink in Derby. I would watch her, ruing the fact that I could not take part.

I remember certain events vividly; when I was fifteen I was sitting in the library at the school doing some work. I screwed a piece of paper into a ball, then walked over to the bin and dropped it in. That is all I remember. I woke up in the sanatorium, with the matronly school nurse clucking over me. There had been a female prefect in the library at the time, and she filled me in on what had happened; I swayed as I walked over to the bin, as if drunk. I managed to get back to my seat, but then keeled over, out cold. The pain had got too much.

That was enough. That happened on a Wednesday or Thursday; on the Monday (May Day bank holiday 1988) I went into Bretby Hospital, where a pleasant doctor called Doctor Newton reassured my parents to trust him; that everything would be fine.

How I curse his name now.

I was on a men's ward despite being only fifteen; I think everyone else there was at least twice my age. Mum and dad were naturally worried, but no-one ever asked the questions that should have been asked. We got told there were two alternatives; they could put a metal rod between bones in my leg and my foot, permanently immobilising the ankle; or they could operate to try and staple the tendon down. My parents understandably chose the latter.

On the Monday I was bathed by a nurse, who shaved my leg. Then, on the Tuesday, I went in for the operation. First they covered my leg in a bleak fluid - iodine, I think - then they gave me a tablet that made me go all woozy. I remember trying to be manly and brave despite being very, very frightened. I had scarcely been into a hospital before; had never broken a bone or had other injury. Everything was so new and strange. They helped me to dress into a robe, and then, as I lay prone with my pulse racing, I was given an injection. Someone asked me to count to ten; I had not been expecting this. I counted to ten, then, unbidden, continued. I think another injection was given, and only then did a welcoming smothering blanket of sleep come over me.

I awoke back in my bed; my overriding memory is of having an incredibly dry mouth. It was so dry that I could not even croak, and I lay motionless in bed for what felt like hours before a nurse approached and offered some water to my lips. It took me some time to come to after what had been my first operation; to my surprise, my leg was in another cast, plaster this time, and the cast was attached to a series of metal rods and pulleys. The pain only came on slowly, rising in waves as the effects of the anaesthetic subsided.

When Doctor Newton eventually came to visit, I got told that I now had metal in my ankle. Apparently they had lengthened the tendon; first they had cut a sliver lengthways out if it, then they had cut the remainder. After that, the had used the sliver to join the two halves, extending it. Finally, they had put an evil-looking staple over the lot. That was a much as we knew; we only learnt a little more when my dad sneaked a peak at my medical notes as my mum distracted the doctor. My dad's attempt at humour: "Well, so, you're worth something to me now. If you die I can scrap you." It was weak, but I could see the fear in his eyes.

I cannot recall how long I was in hospital for; possibly a week, possibly less. Mum and dad brought in reading material for me - books and magazines - and I spent a long time talking to the people who surrounded me. One of them was a man in his fifties who worked for the railway works in Derby. He had been cycling home one evening when he had fallen off his bike, shattering a leg in many places. His friendly voice filled in the long gaps between visits from my parents.

My leg remained in a cast for a while, then it came out. For an all-too-brief period, I was without pain. I could do things. Then my ankle and leg start hurting once more, and I think there was another operation, followed by a long period with my leg in a cast. It was the start of a pattern that would last for ten years; an operation followed by an all too brief period free of pain. I tried to make the most of those periods - I did my Duke of Edinburgh's Award Gold expedition (the expeditions at Denstone were very hard), and did lots more walking around the area from school. For these reasons, I know that my love of walking has always been with me.

When I was eighteen I went to Queen Mary and Westfield College in London, to study the obscure subject of geological engineering (a combination of geology and civil engineering). The studies were interesting, and it allowed me to look at large engineering projects - a love that is still in my life.

Unfortunately, the pain-free period was not to last. At about Easter time, we went on a geology field trip to the southwest. It was an interesting trip, even though geology was not my favourite subject. The lecturer was an emeritus professor, so old that he had been a Japanese prisoner of war. During one of the nights I ended up jumping on a bed and banging my ankle on the wooden side of the bed. The next day we had a long walk studying the geology of the Torquay area, and my ankle was pretty much agony for the rest of the day.

So started fifteen months of absolute agony. At least, that is the way I remember it. That is the funny thing about pain; it is hard to remember exactly what it was like. Perhaps it is a self-defence mechanism, but I would see a specialist after yet another setback, and he would ask "is it the same sort and intensity of pain that you had before?".

The honest answer is, I could never tell him. It was the same sort of pain, certainly, in the fact it would be in my ankle and leg; but the same intensity? How do you measure that? The mind draws a curtain over pain, dulling the memories with time, but always lets you remember that it had been there. The memories of the pain have permanently scarred me; the scars are invisible to everyone else, but are all too vivid in my own mind.

For months I saw a beautiful blonde physiotherapist, Andrea, who would try and teach me to walk properly again. She would work the muscles and tendons to try and relieve the pain, moving and massaging my ankle. In the meantime I was seeing a pleasant orthopaedic surgeon, who would give me a series of ever-increasing complex x-rays and scans, looking for somewhere that the metal within my ankle had fractured the bone. The strangest of these was a bone scan; a kind of inverse x-ray. In this they injected me with a radioactive dye, then waited as the dye got absorbed by the bone. This gave them a very good view of the structure of the bone within my leg. As I half expected, it did not show up any problems.

They gave me a strange electrical device to attach to my leg. Every ten or so seconds, it would send a pulse of electricity into the muscles in my lower leg, causing my entire leg and knee to jerk up uncontrollably. Occasionally I would attach it to my wrist; if I held my fingers out straight, the electricity would cause my fingers to jerk closed into a fist. I went to the cinema to see Basic Instinct with some friends; the jerking of my leg caused the seat in front to move backwards and forwards, causing the man sitting in it to give me curious looks, as if he was wondering exactly what I was doing to cause my leg to spasm in that manner.

One day, a friend of mine, a devout leftie, visited the physio with me. I was attending the London Independent Hospital in Stepney Green, an excellent private hospital. The friend did not approve of private hospitals, and certainly did not approve of me attending one. One day, I managed to persuade her to come with me to a physio session. She sat outside reading a book whilst Andrea manipulated my leg on a bed. Suddenly she warned me, 'I'm going to just try something', then pressed down on the ankle.

My entire body jumped off the bed, and I screamed as I passed out. My friend came running in, wondering what these awful people had done to me. I didn't blame Andrea, particularly given what happened soon afterwards.

Despite the pain, I used to go for seven-mile walks along the Regents Canal, from neat my flat in Mile End all the way to Paddington. That was the funny thing, the thing that no-one seemed to fully understand; short walks did not really seem to effect the intensity of the pain. There was a nearly continuous pain, a background low drone that I could ignore. However, this background discomfort was accompanied by occasional hideous, agonising sharp spikes of pain. The merest pressure of the duvet on my foot could cause a painful twinge, and whilst the painkillers could dull the background pain, they did nothing about these sharp spikes. So, occasionally, if I felt up to it, I would walk.

I really enjoyed these strolls. The Regents Canal is a schizophrenic beast; one minute it passes through a beautiful area, all modern, glass-fronted buildings and posh wine bars, the next it goes through an area of old industrial buildings, with rusting wharves and graffiti-laden canal side buildings. I loved every single inch of this green corridor through the centre of the capital. I think they helped to keep me sane, helped to focus on something other than the pain.

I had probably been seeing Andrea for these hour-long physio sessions for about nine months, the majority of the academic year. Eventually Andrea proclaimed that she thought the problem was neurological rather than orthopaedic, and invited me to go down to see a different surgeon.

She led me downstairs to a small consulting room to see a man. My first impression was that he was a jovial man, and he had a round face, round glasses and a healthy mane of wild, shock-white hair. He introduced himself as Professor Sidney Watkins - the professor bit impressed me, if nothing else. I sat down on the bed whilst he studied my notes, then he spent about five minutes asking me some fairly searching questions and manipulating my ankle this way and that. Only then did he say the magic words: "I think I know what's wrong."

I cannot tell you how good those words sounded to me; I had seen so many specialists who were routinely perplexed by the injury. Yet here was someone who, after only a cursory examination, thought he knew the problem. For some reason I instinctively trusted him; perhaps it was his air of authority, developed over many years of practice, or perhaps it was just desperation on my part. I wanted someone to know what was wrong with me.

His idea was that the problem with my ankle was nothing to do with the metal or the bone; nothing orthopaedic, but neurological. In particular, that the main nerve providing the left-hand side of my foot was damaged. What's more - and I cannot tell you how much I wanted to hear this - he knew what to do about it.

Fast forward some time, and I'm in hospital for what I think was my third operation. This time, the hospital was very different - the London Independent is a light, airy and friendly place, clean and tidy. What's more, the room was private. I remember watching the first ever episode of Peak Practice, with Kevin Whatley starring alongside my beloved Derbyshire scenery.

I cannot remember much about the operation or the aftermath; just that Prof Watkins appeared to be confident. When he opened up my ankle, he discovered that some stitching had been left in after the first operation all those years ago. This was right next to the nerve, and the rubbing of the stitching against the nerve was causing the pain. Then, when I had banged my ankle on the bed, the nerve had actually swollen to encompass the stitching. As the stitching was attached to the tendon, the merest movement of my ankle would pull the stitching through the nerve, causing the pain. He removed the stitching, and protected the nerve with some fatty tissue.

I left hospital on crutches, my bag slung over my shoulders. My flat was less than half a mile away, but it was a stupid sign of independence.

For a year I had been attending occasional lectures at the Institute of Civil Engineers in Westminster, listening to talks on what was going on in the wonderful world of civil engineering. One evening, I chatted to a man in his early thirties, a civil engineer with a large international firm. He had spent the last ten years doing nothing but designing concrete beams; he was the acknowledged expert in his company on the things. Because of this, because of his utter specialisation, he never got to do other, more varied work. This in turn meant that he could not get chartered status, a prerequisite of progressing in the career.

I wanted to do site work; to be going around digging tunnels and foundations, constructing things. Yet at the back of my mind I knew that there was a good chance that my ankle would never be good enough to allow me to do site work. That meant that I would be stuck in an office all day, designing beams or some other ridiculous specialism. That was not what I wanted from life.

Friends started getting me freelance computing work, and slowly I started to abandon my degree. I did not tell my parents at the time; instead, I made sure that I had a firm background behind me before telling them. Thankfully, although they were disappointed, they understood.

With hindsight, it was the right decision. For my ankle did go wrong again a few months later, and I was plunged back into a cycle of pain, sleepless nights and physio. Professor Watkins again tried to protect the nerve with a sheaf of fatty tissue. I was plunged back into hospital life, and my degree was further abandoned.

I'd like to think I did fairly well for myself in that period; I did some freelance and contracting work, earned a little money. I was going through a phase where I would not tell anyone what was really going on, as if the truth (none of it in any way scandalous) was a weapon that could be used against me. There were a bunch of people, friends, who I went out with, singing ourselves hoarse in the back of a car on a Friday night, yet I doubt any of them really knew me.

Slowly I started to realise there were gaps in my knowledge. I could program well enough - certainly well enough to earn a good income - but I was totally self-taught, and there were gaping holes in my knowledge. As I was missing Derbyshire, I said goodbye to London and went back up north, enrolling in an HND at Derby University.

I really enjoyed the course. I was a mature student and, what's more, one who knew an awful lot about the subject I was being taught. In particular, I knew more about programming than most of the lecturers who were meant to be teaching it. I'd like to think that I thrived.

Then, my ankle went again. This time, instead of going back to see Prof Watkins in London, we went to a private neurosurgeon in Burton. The surgeon studied me, then proclaimed that the problem was probably not in my ankle but my lower back. In some ways that made sense; I was getting shooting pains in my leg, but I'd never really had any bad back trouble. My dad really did not like this prognosis; he could not see the sense in having someone fiddling about with my back - with all the consequent dangers - when the previous operations had all been in my ankle. He immediately sent me down to London to see Prof Watkins.

It was good to see the Prof again - he was a jovial, pleasant man, and I trusted him, even though he had not yet managed to fix me. He had an unshakeable aura of authority around him, a confidence that I now knew came from being one of Britain's top neurosurgeons. He took a look at the notes from the doctor in Burton, proclaimed him an incompetent, and looked at sorting me out.

So it was another operation. Again the Prof. tried to wrap the nerve with fatty tissue. Then it was back to Derby, and this time I felt as though it may just, finally, be over. I don't know why; part of it was trust in the Prof, and part of it was the fact that I was older. But most was the fact that there were now other things in my life, things that meant I was no longer quite so afraid of the pain.

I left Uni, and got a job at Acorn Computers in Cambridge, working on various bits and pieces of software - a port of Macromedia Director, work on build systems and Network Computers. Looking back, I loved it.

The pain started again before the end of my first year at the company. I drove down to London to see the Prof, who actually apologised for having had to operate so many times to fix the problem. That was a measure of the man - he was famous, so much more important than me, yet he apologised, even when I didn't think such an action was necessary. What is more, he had only a handful of private clients left; he had mostly retired, aside from his work in motorsport. I felt honoured that I was one of them, that he had not left me behind. Perhaps he saw me as unfinished business.

He decided that there was no other option but to remove the nerve out of my foot. It was something he had been trying to avoid; an irreversible action that could lead to serious problems with my feet. Yet again I found myself in hospital, afraid, trying to be a man despite the fear.

I remember asking Prof Watkins if he thought I'd ever be able to walk the Pennine Way, and his reply "I can't see why not," was joy to my ears. People had been telling me for years that I could not do this, must not do that, in case I hurt my ankle and cause myself another bout of pain. Yet here was a wise, expert man, who was telling me otherwise.

Telling me to chase my dreams.

I had the operation, and the same, long, curving red line on my ankle was cut open again. They had given up trying to stitch the wound closed, and a series of about thirty metal staples kept the wound closed.

I was determined to walk. At the time I lived in Waterbeach, just north of Cambridge, My bedsit was about two hundred yards away from Bottisham Lock on the River Cam, a beautiful spot. On one gloriously warm Sunday aternoon, I set out to walk from my front door to the river without crutches. It took me about ten minutes to limp to the river, where I was greeted with the sun glinting down on the water - it is a beautiful, enlivening spot. Even now, over ten years later, after thousands of miles walked and countless spectacular locations, it still holds a place in my heart.

The hideous reality only hit me once I climbed the bank up to the lock- I would have to walk back. It took me about an hour, including a long rest on a bench near a level crossing. Tears were streaming down my face by the time that I finally made it back to my front door, a heady combination of agony, adrenalin and euphoria running through my system.

About three weeks after the operation I drove down to London, parked at South Woodford, got the tube to Mile End, and then walked to the hospital. All the time the staples resolutely held my ankle together, like a line of miniature military defences over a trench.

Prof Watkins seemed happy with the results; he showed me a little tube that contained the nerve he had removed. It was a few millimetres in diameter at one end, and at the other it was a messy blob about double the size. He'd had to cut it out from the surrounding tissue, as it had been unclear where the nerve ended and the scar tissue began.

Next he used a needle and another instrument to test how much feeling I had lost in my foot, and thankfully the damage was little. The nerves had been damaged for so long, that some had grown over the side of my foot, meaning that there were few areas without feeling. In that way at least, the operation had been a success.

He used a disposable plastic staple remover to take the staples out - it looked like the sort you get in any office. As he did the last few at the top of my ankle, about an inch of the wound reopened. I was given an injection of local anesethtic, and some medistrips were applied to hold that part of the wound together. I managed to get back to South Woodford, and somehow I drove back up the M11, despite feeling very woozy from the drugs. Thank God I had bought an automatic car.

And that was that. Within fifteen months I had completed the Pennine Way, and I haven't looked back since. I'm a very different person to the boy I was then; I am more confident, and the fear of further pain no longer lurks like a spectre over my shoulders.

I still get pain from my ankle occasionally; brief glimpses back into the past that cause me to go into a cold sweat. Şencan tells me that my leg occasionally spasms in the night, in the same way that it did in those awful, hideous days of '92 and '93. I sleep through it every time. Perhaps my ankle will go wrong again, and the pain restart. If so, then at least I have made the most of the last ten years.

The problem is that I've seen so many other people who have had much more serious medical problems than mine, yet they live through it. Was the pain really that bad, did I have to let it consume me so utterly? And was the fear of the pain, that feeling that I would never escape it's clutches, worth the anguish? More than anything else, I feel ashamed of my own weakness.

So that is the story. The boy and man who suffered all that pain is the same person who now walks thousands of miles for fun. People seem to think I walk because of the ankle; that is far from the truth. I did the Pennine Way to prove that I could walk; since then, I have done it because I love it.

Was I weak? Was I strong? Was I a drama queen? Was I stoic? I don't know, and in many ways I don't care. I'm glad it happened; I'm glad I suffered, I am who I am due to the troubles and pain. The pain shaped me, formed me into the man I am.

I can't imagine being anyone else.

Tuesday, 24 March 2009

Book review: "Bad science", by Ben Goldacre

If science were a person, it would be an old and faded star, living the life of a recluse in some Beverly Hills mansion. Newspapers write sensational stories about his life, caring little for the facts or accentuating what little information they have. Even science's friends do little to help, and instead would stoke the fires by giving inept statements to the media.

If this analogy were to be stretched even further, then Ben Goldacre would be science's chief spokesperson, cutting through the incorrect stories to reach some semblance of the truth. He would be fighting a losing battle.

In 'Bad science', doctor, researcher and Guardian columnist Ben Goldacre details the way that many parties - nutritionists, the media, politicians, even pharmaceutical companies and scientists themselves - are misrepresenting science to the public.

The main interface between science and society, the media, is doing an exceptionally poor job, one that is costing everyone. Instead of reporting science fairly and evenly, they are, as a whole, descending down to the lowest common denominator, their stories aimed solely at increasing their circulation over fair or accurate reporting.

The media, akin to a hungry wolf, needs a free supply of stories with which to feed its ravenous belly. And the wolf cares little for the scientific method. It will report any story, based on the scantiest of evidence or misreading of scientific papers. It is particularly hungry for the current 'in' stories - autism and MMR; the beneficial aspects of antioxidants or the harm or benefits of certain foodstuffs.

It is hard to stress how important this book is. On the front, Charlie Brooker is quoted as saying, "The most important book you'll read this year, and quite possibly the funniest too." Whilst the second part of the statement is debatable, the first is an understatement. Indeed, this might be the most important book you ever read. What is more, it is also easy to read.

There is much wrong with the way the public sees science, and Ben Goldacre, who also writes a 'Bad Science' blog, goes into some of the complex reasons. No-one is spared - the media, the pharmaceutical industry, so-called 'alternative' therapies, and even the public itself - all comes in for criticism.

Is it right that the public are being conned by alternative-health therapists into using alternative medicine rather than conventional? Is it right that the media routinely reports scientific trials incompetently? That the media use 'doctors' who have no real formal qualifications to peddle their own 'treatments'? That the pharmaceutical industry often misrepresents data from trials on its drugs? That the media have put the lives of our children in danger by making a 'scandal' out of the MMR vaccine?

This book contains all the basic tools on how to filter adverts, media reports or scientific advances, in order to get to the truth of the claims. And there are a great deal of claims out there. Indeed, we are bombarded with them every day - a new hoped-for cure for cancer, or a new drug with some silly pseudo-scientific ingredient that will magically give you less wrinkles. All of these are promoted daily in the media, yet the media rarely, if ever, look at the science behind the claims. And, as Goldacre points out, an alarming number of the claims are either hyped-up or plain wrong. The media's obsession with 'new breakthroughs' harms the public's perception of science.

As an example, he gives a simple experiment to show that 'ear candles' do no good at all (yet no journalists have ever tried similar 'research', and continue to promote them). He also mentions that our schools are being filled with a nonsense called 'brain gym', a pseudo-science that claims that movements can aid learning difficulties, yet has no science backing the claims. This leads to the incredible situation where the state is indoctrinating our children with bad science from a young age.

Homoeopathy also comes in for criticism, in particular to the fact that no clinical or scientific research backs it up. Yet despite this, people continue to make vast amounts of money from this con. Ben Goldacre explains some of the reasons behind this very well, including the fallacy that something diluted to 30C (i.e. one part in 10^60) could possibly have an effect.

The book also has a detailed chapter on the placebo effect - the strange fact that giving someone a non-effective treatment can actually improve symptoms. This is a fact long regarded by scientists, and little understood. It is the placebo effect that allows many 'alternative' therapies to show improvements, and allows fraudulent claims of improvements to be made.

Despite what his critics may say, Ben Goldacre is no friend of the pharmaceutical industry, and this too comes in for heavy (and justified) criticism. The chase for profits can 9and often does) get in the way of good science.

There are some funny moments in the book - Ben Goldacre gets his dead cat Hettie to be a 'certified professional member' of the American Association of Nutritional Consultants. This shows that people who use such associations as proof of skills or training can be exceptionally bogus. Additionally, when he contacts the 'academic' institution 'Institute of Optimum Nutrition', he gets told that they are 'a research institute, so they don't have time for academic papers and stuff'. This is how farcical 'alternative' medicine can get - a research institute that admits it does not publish papers!

The book also details several reasons why good scientists and people get things wrong, including cognitive illusions. These are useful when trying to interpret many kinds of evidence, and not just scientific papers.
  1. We see patterns where there is only random noise
  2. We see causal relationships where there are none.
  3. We overvalue confirmatory information for any given hypothesis
  4. We seek out confirmatory information for any given hypothesis.
  5. Our assessment of the quality of new evidence is biased by our previous beliefs.
These could perhaps be condensed as the following statement: "I've taken drug A, and as expected I feel better. Therefore drug A has cured me. After all, it cured my friend." Did drug A really cure the person, and can an effect really be seen from only one person's experience?

Decades ago, science fiction writers wrote stories of dystopian future worlds, where the Human race has split up into the intelligentsia - the scientists, the artisans and the politicians - and the workers - everyone else. The intelligentsia lived luxury lives, whilst the proletariat toiled away endlessly, unable to change their fate from birth.

In reality a split has occurred, except the scientists are on their own on one side, trying (and generally failing) to explain to the public how science works, and what can be expected of it. In the meantime, the public perceives scientists as nerdy, geeky poindexters with no social skills.

This image, whilst deserved in a few cases, is really far from the truth. We need scientists, and we need to understand science. Failure to do so could be bad for us all.

Pet Shop Boys at Koko.

Last Friday I happened to visit the Pet Shop Boys website, and I noticed an offer for free tickets to see them perform a couple of songs for the Channel 4 'Album Chart Show' in Camden yesterday. There were only a couple of tickets available, so I sent an email, then got a confirmation a few minutes later. I was in.

Only then did I realise the problem. Yesterday was also my birthday, and I wanted to spend as much of it as possible around Şencan before she travels back to Turkey on Wednesday. We had a chat, and the lovely lady wanted me to go. What a star ;-)

It turned out that a friend, Neil, also had managed to get a ticket, so I drove up to his house in Purley yesterday afternoon, then travelled by train from there up to Camden.

Koko used to be called the Camden Palace, a nightclub that I used to spend a lot of time in when I first moved to London. Sadly, I had not been back to it in over seventeen years, during which time it had been through at least one refurbishment. In truth, I hardly recognised the place. It is funny how it appeared to have changed from how I remembered it - the whole building appeared to be taller, as though someone had added an extra floor on. The decoration was also very different, appearing far more baroque than it used to.

We got in with no problem - no-one even asked to see our tickets. The interior was packed - after dropping off our coats at the cloakroom (£2 each) we went up to the balcony on the second floor and watched as the run-up started.

As it was all being filmed for Channel 4, the show took on a certain theatrical and surreal feel. A presenter asked everyone to shout, yell and wave our arms in the air as though a band had just finished. These scenes would be merged in later and were, quite frankly, pants.

PSB were the first band on and ended up doing a short set - only two songs - 'Love, etc' and 'Always on my Mind'. Both excellent, of course, but I really wanted more.

There then followed a short period whilst Sarah Cox did some links, and again we were asked to wave our hands in the air for the background music. It was all very artificial.

Lady Sovereign was on next, performing three songs whilst wearing outrageously large white sunglasses. She made a few comments about drinking Red Stripe, then asked all the crowd to put their middle fingers in the air. Utterly tosserific - rage against the machine, girl! What followed were three very poor rap songs (although I am being unfair - I have just listened to some of her songs on YouTube and they are far better than the performance last night). Plus, she is undeniably cute.

We left soon after that, as we hadn't heard of the other bands following on. Also, the rather long lag between the bands was annoying and the beer was expensive (then again, it was a club). We got our coats, bought a Subway each, and then headed back to Neil's place.

I ended up crashing on Neil and Ina's couch for the night - the first time I have done that in years. I used to spend an inordinate amount of time sleeping on friends' sofas, but as I've got older it has become less and less necessary. It felt strangely pleasant, as though I was regressing nearly twenty years - going to the Camden Palace and then sleeping on someone's sofa.

All in all, it was a pleasant way to spend my birthday. It was quite cheap as well; about twenty quid for the fuel, five for the train ticket, and a tenner or so for the drinks. Not at all bad.